One of the women who reported Julian Assange is Anna Bernardin. She is a left wing politician in the

swedish Social Democrats.

Anna Bernardin (Anna Ardin) is a Christian, feminist, social democrat, animal rights activist and an opponent of abortiont. She comes from the Gotland island off the Swedish coast. She has previously worked as equality manager at Uppsala University.  Now she works at the brotherhoodmovement and “glow of peace, solidarityand justice …. for a fair, transparent and cohesive society ”. On her own blog, she describes herself:

I am a political scientist, communicator, entrepreneur and freelance writer with specific knowledge in faith & politics, gender issues, feminism and Latin America.

Saturday 14 August at 14 o’clock, she writes on twitter.com/annaardin:

Julian wants to go on a ?? shrimpdinner??  , anyone have free spots for tomorrow?

Tidigt på morgonen söndagen den 15 augusti skriver hon igen på Twitter:

Siting outside two of clock with the coolest and smartest people, its just amazing #fb

In connection with  that Anna Bernardin reports Julian Assange to the Swdish police for rape  August 20 she deleted these comments on Twitter. Why? To the authors knowledge it is not common for real victims to delete blogs, clean phones and trying to get witnesses to testify something that is not true. Why is it so important that these comments be deleted?

If you know that the “reported  assault” took place on the night of Saturday 14 August the whole thing becomes more understandable.

The comments suggest the fact that Anna Bernardin really liked Julian and there had been no abuse 24 hours before. The comments can not imagine that Anna Bernardin believe that Julian has a skewed attitude to women and can not take no for an answer. The comments are more an attempt by Anna Bernardin to bask in the glory of Julian Assange. Why else would she publish them online? The comments on Twitter does not fit with Anna’s story to the police on 20 May. So she simply deletes them .

Evidence that Anna Bernardin hide the truth

In early September, the Swedish author note that Anna Bernardin has two identical mini-blogs “. One on Twitter and one on Bloggy.se. As it looks  Anna Bernardin adds comments on both blogs simultaneously. The comments that have been deleted on Twitter are clearly visible at annaardin.bloggy.se.  Anna has missed that you have to delete each blog individually. Bad luck.

To check whether Anna Bernardin really want to hide the Twitter comments, the author write a comment on Sara Gunnerud article “Wikileaksheroes can also do clueless things.”The article is published on Rebellabloggen, a socialist feminist blog where Anna Bernardin is involved and is a web manager. In his comments he tell  about the deleted comments on Twitter.  After 5 days, 13 September,  his comment where moderated and was deleted immediately. The author write  another comment in which he tsays that you can read the deleted comments on annaardin.bloggy.se. His message is deleted directly. About an hour later, the entire Bloggy.se goes down. When Bloggy.se reopens at 4 o’clock in the morning of 14 September, the deleted Twitter comments are also deleted on annaardin.bloggy.se

Now it’s not so easy to erase stuff online that Anna Bernardin think. Google takes “snapshots” of how various Web pages look like. A so-called cache. If you are looking up the cached page for annaardin.bloggy.se so you can see how the page looked like on August 19.  The cache is now deleted.

As we can see Anna Bernardin do what she can to hide their comments. Comments indication that Julian Assange is actually innocent of at least one of the “abuse” he is accused of. It looks like Anna Bernardin does what she can to get Julian Assange convicted. By deleting, denied exculpatory evidence, she is perhaps guilty of false IMPUTATION bySwedish law.

The Penal Code Chapter 15, § 7 A person who, otherwise than 6 § intends, among prosecutors, police or other authority truth loose approaches like rivets or other criminal acts, representations embarrassing circumstance or deny exculpatory or mitigating circumstance, shall be sentenced, if the authority has to pick up the notification of such thing, the false IMPUTATION to imprisonment not exceeding two years or, if the crime is petty, to a fine or imprisonment not exceeding six months.

The case Assange get really nasty if we take in everything that has happened in the case. Anyone who wants to learn more, see this article and this article. Julian lives in Anna Bernardin apartment, 11 August to 19-20 August. During that time, Julian and Anna have sex probably up to several times. Around 18 to 19 August   Anna received a call from a woman who is looking for Julian.  Anna finds out that Julian also had consented sex with this woman…. The two women who are both Christian and has links to the Brotherhood movement and attended the seminar on the Brotherhood movement understands immediately that Julian does not have any serious long-term intentions with them. They decide after calls to press charges against Julian Assange of sexual abuse.

It seems rather seem strange that a Christian socialist feminist uses of the law to get revenge on a man who is ”cheating”. But when you read about Anna Bernardin post about revenge, it’s no longer strange. It all becomes clear. Anna Bernardin, who have long wondered how to get revenge on a man who dumps her, or is cheating. When the second woman showed up, she was able to make a smart plan . Anna Bernardin has planned it all good. She has got another woman to stand behind the rape report. A case of revenge by proxy. And then have been helped by Claes Borgström, who did everything he could to try to get Julian Assange prosecuted vigorously cheered by the feminist blogs.

But the truth will  eventually come out. Anna’s perfect ”seven step modell for legal revenge”failed. A deletion too little. And the Google cache.  Unfortunately, Anna. Bad luck.Lord’s ways are inscrutable.

Translation from the blog : http://www.samtycke.nu i hope its ok, the world needs to know..

And here is more:

Anna Ardin: ‘Oops I Did It Again!’

A followup from Internet detective Göran Rudling. From 12 December 2010.

[UPDATE: Anna Ardin did in fact make the whole story up as part of her 'seven step plan for revenge'. See here.]

STOCKHOLM (Radsoft/Rixstep) — As Göran Rudling put the finishing touches on his research into Anna Ardin’s ‘attacks on facts‘, he saw additional evidence of her mucking about.

Ardin’s now cleaned her blog as well.

From 7 to 1

Ardin’s article on the ‘seven steps to legal revenge’ has now been redacted so only the first step remains. ‘It seems like some people think you can hit a ‘delete’ button to change history’, comments Rudling. ‘My thoughts go directly to the Soviet Union under Stalin where they too thought they could change history by blurring photographs and redacting books.’

Side by Side

Rudling’s comparison of Anna Ardin’s revenge plans ‘before’ and ‘after’. Can you see any difference?

Note: Ardin’s list is not a simple translation of the original. She’s put a lot of time and thought into making it her own. Note as well the original list was written about women (evidently by a man). Ardin has for some unknown reason changed the gender of the target.

Early Attacker

Rudling further reports that his original article was published at 06:19 local time on 30 September 2010; yet by 06:44 the same morning -25 minutes later – Anna Ardin was in his mailbox with an attack.

‘I removed the tweets to try to avoid the attention of the media I understood would come, it was rough enough anyway, and I’ve never tried to remove that translated revenge list. I don’t at all understand how it could be related to this.’ – Anna Ardin Thursday 30 September 2010 06:44

‘That was her explanation to why she removed tweets on or around 20 August’, comments Ruding. ‘But it doesn’t explain why she removed tweets again on 14 September.’

‘And isn’t it funny that a seven-step plan for revenge has been residing on a blog read by so many members of Ardin’s christian ‘brotherhood’ movement and no one at all reacted before Ardin accused Assange of molestation?’

See Also
eHow: How to Get Legal Revenge
Google Search: 7 Steps to Legal Revenge Anna Ardin
Samtycke Nu: Fallet Assange: Uppgifter raderas om och om igen
Rixstep Industry Watch: Assange Case: Evidence Destroyed Over and Over Again

• http://www.facebook.com her fb page, look,  spam and laugh
• WikiLeaks
• http://ardin.se/ personal page
• WikiLeaks
• Julian Assange
• Avaaz.org – Avaaz.org – The World In Action